"Jane Roe” Endorses Ron Paul on Roe v. Wade Anniversary

[offroadaz]

“I support Ron Paul for president because we share the same goal, that of overturning Roe v Wade. Ron Paul doesn’t just talk about being pro-life, he acts on it. His voting record truly is impeccable and he undoubtedly understands our constitutional republic and the inalienable right to life for all. Ron Paul is the prime author of H.R. 300, which would negate the effect of Roe v. Wade. As the signor of the affidavit that legalized abortion 35 years ago I appreciate Ron Paul’s action to restore protection for the unborn. Ron Paul has also authored H.R. 1094 in Congress, which seeks to define life as beginning at conception. He has never wavered on the issue of being pro-life and has a voting record to prove it. He understands the importance of civil liberties for all, including the unborn.

“After taking all of the presidential candidates into consideration, it is obvious that Ron Paul is the only one that doesn’t just talk the talk. For this reason and those stated above, I am publicly endorsing Ron Paul for president.”

http://people.ronpaul2008.com/campai...e-anniversary/

[John_P]

What is Ron Paul's stance on the millions of embryos frozen in fertility clinics across the nation? Do they have a right to life too?

[offroadaz]

Originally Posted by John_P

What is Ron Paul's stance on the millions of embryos frozen in fertility clinics across the nation? Do they have a right to life too?

Save "snowflake babies": no experiments on frozen embryos. (Sep 2007)
No tax funding for organizations that promote abortion. (Sep 2007)
Embryonic stem cell programs not constitionally authorized. (May 2007)
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)

http://www.ontheissues.org/Ron_Paul.htm#Abortion

[John_P]

Originally Posted by offroadaz

Save "snowflake babies": no experiments on frozen embryos. (Sep 2007)
No tax funding for organizations that promote abortion. (Sep 2007)
Embryonic stem cell programs not constitionally authorized. (May 2007)
Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)

http://www.ontheissues.org/Ron_Paul.htm#Abortion

Thanks for the link...been through them...notice he opposes there use in research...but that is not the same as saying they have a "right to life". Should we allow all of them to develop?

Second, is it murder when we implant these fertilized embryos in a woman KNOWING some will die?

Where does Ron Paul stand on that?

[06GrnRubi]

Originally Posted by John_P

Second, is it murder when we implant these fertilized embryos in a woman KNOWING some will die?

Is it Murder when we allow people to have children when we know some of them will die?


What a stupid question.

[offroadaz]

Originally Posted by John_P

Thanks for the link...been through them...notice he opposes there use in research...but that is not the same as saying they have a "right to life". Should we allow all of them to develop?

Second, is it murder when we implant these fertilized embryos in a woman KNOWING some will die?

Where does Ron Paul stand on that?

I would assume that Paul opposes their use on a moral ground. Although I cant find where this specific question has been asked of him

Take a look at the articles he wrote regarding stem cell research and abortion
http://ronpaullibrary.org/topic.php?id=21

[John_P]

Originally Posted by 06GrnRubi

Is it Murder when we allow people to have children when we know some of them will die?


What a stupid question.

Woman generally do not get pregnant with the intention of letting a fetus die. Doctors implant many more embryos than what is natural KNOWING they will die...See the difference? Intent. Abortion is a decision made with intent...