PDA

View Full Version : Stupid Motorist Law : Section 28-910 of the Arizona Revised Statute


Polka Dot
12-11-2007, 06:24 AM
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/28/00910.htm&Title=28&DocType=ARS/

28-910. Liability for emergency responses in flood areas; definitions

A. A driver of a vehicle who drives the vehicle on a public street or highway that is temporarily covered by a rise in water level, including groundwater or overflow of water, and that is barricaded because of flooding is liable for the expenses of any emergency response that is required to remove from the public street or highway the driver or any passenger in the vehicle that becomes inoperable on the public street or highway or the vehicle that becomes inoperable on the public street or highway, or both.

B. A person convicted of violating section 28-693 for driving a vehicle into any area that is temporarily covered by a rise in water level, including groundwater or overflow of water, may be liable for expenses of any emergency response that is required to remove from the area the driver or any passenger in the vehicle that becomes inoperable in the area or the vehicle that becomes inoperable in the area, or both.

C. The expenses of an emergency response are a charge against the person liable for those expenses pursuant to subsection A or B of this section. The charge constitutes a debt of that person and may be collected proportionately by the public agencies, for-profit entities or not-for-profit entities that incurred the expenses. The person's liability for the expenses of an emergency response shall not exceed two thousand dollars for a single incident. The liability imposed under this section is in addition to and not in limitation of any other liability that may be imposed.

D. An insurance policy may exclude coverage for a person's liability for expenses of an emergency response under this section.

E. For the purposes of this section:

1. "Expenses of an emergency response" means reasonable costs directly incurred by public agencies, for-profit entities or not-for-profit entities that make an appropriate emergency response to an incident.

2. "Public agency" means this state and any city, county, municipal corporation, district or other public authority that is located in whole or in part in this state and that provides police, fire fighting, medical or other emergency services.

3. "Reasonable costs" includes the costs of providing police, fire fighting, rescue and emergency medical services at the scene of an incident and the salaries of the persons who respond to the incident but does not include charges assessed by an ambulance service that is regulated pursuant to title 36, chapter 21.1, article 2.

petersharp
12-11-2007, 07:15 AM
Why is this stupid? IMO the fine is right.

Check out:

http://www.azcentral.com/community/scottsdale/articles/1203abrk-wash1203.html

They need to stop stupid people like this.

ShmUDE
12-11-2007, 07:20 AM
"stupid motorist law" is actually the name. He isn't calling the law stupid! Its a great law and they deserve the fine...or more

Fire Ball
12-11-2007, 07:26 AM
OK rick you owe me 2 bottles of water, a doughnut and a cup of coffee for my part the rescue. The gas is on me since I actually had a blast running around sycamore looking for a safe water crossing :D

Yee haw, 3 hours of wheeling and I told the wife it was a lot of work :D

petersharp
12-11-2007, 07:34 AM
"stupid motorist law" is actually the name. He isn't calling the law stupid! Its a great law and they deserve the fine...or more

OK, I didn't realise that was the name - I thought he was saying that law was stupid.

When they put the barricades up, are they advisory or enforcing? I mean, if they close the wash cos it's got 1' deep water and you decide to go through it in your Jeep without incident, are you breaking the law?

ROKBITR
12-11-2007, 07:55 AM
It could also lead to trial, and road closures if it keeps happening.

ShmUDE
12-11-2007, 07:59 AM
OK rick you owe me 2 bottles of water, a doughnut and a cup of coffee for my part the rescue. The gas is on me since I actually had a blast running around sycamore looking for a safe water crossing:D

Well if thats the case...

I'll be needing a half a sandwitch, a monster energy drink and a tube of pringles. Gas is on me as well because that was just too much fun for a monday!:fashizzle:

AZG23
12-11-2007, 08:08 AM
OK, I didn't realise that was the name - I thought he was saying that law was stupid.

When they put the barricades up, are they advisory or enforcing? I mean, if they close the wash cos it's got 1' deep water and you decide to go through it in your Jeep without incident, are you breaking the law?


Once they are up....the road is closed...as easy as it may be for a Jeep to cross it no problem...its still a closed road.

Antman
12-11-2007, 08:29 AM
When you go past the barricade, you've broken the law! :sifone:

AZG23
12-11-2007, 12:32 PM
Bill ! That pic of those glasses.goggles reminds me of an old favorite TV show..??

http://www.virtualjeepclub.com/image.php?u=104&dateline=1197352448

Looks just like the ol Sleestacks.......

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bb/Land_of_the_Lost_%281974%29_-_Sleestak.jpg

amber.hodge
12-11-2007, 01:03 PM
When I read the first post in this thread all I could think of was when our special redheadded teenaged rebel got stuck out in the sycamore area and had to have the police chopper escort home.........

SHNIPE
12-11-2007, 02:39 PM
You forget that this only cost them if they ask for help.

A person convicted of violating section 28-693...may be liable for expenses of any emergency response that is required to remove from the area the driver or any passenger in the vehicle that becomes inoperable in the area or the vehicle that becomes inoperable in the area

No one called for help, the removal or rescue of the person/vehicle was not REQUIRED and there for wouldnt be convicted of it unless they called and asked for assistance. ONe could argue that the emergency response is not warranted and then not be liable.

amber.hodge
12-11-2007, 02:41 PM
I thought his friend called 911....may be my memory is failing on me. :confused: It would be silly for them to get charged since VJC got the jeep out.

slickrrr
12-11-2007, 04:04 PM
no barricades were up when i got stuck so I guess I didnt violate the stupid motorist law, I dont think I followed the safe wheeling law though, thanks agin fireball david kevin dennis and all the others the day trip definatel helped finding a quick way in, next time out ill bring plenty of refreshments, all are welcome thanks again
Rick

Fire Ball
12-11-2007, 06:39 PM
The only barricade was the one in his frontal lobe...

sorry Rick, couldn't resist :D